↓ Skip to main content

兵庫県立西武庫公園分区園の開設とその利用状況調査に関する報告

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architects, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 107)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
兵庫県立西武庫公園分区園の開設とその利用状況調査に関する報告
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architects, July 2011
DOI 10.5632/jila1934.29.4_6
Authors

勝浦 康之

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architects
#5
of 107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,522
of 131,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architects
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 107 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.