↓ Skip to main content

暫定2車線区間におけるワイヤロープ式防護柵の導入可能性について

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management), December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 137)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
暫定2車線区間におけるワイヤロープ式防護柵の導入可能性について
Published in
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management), December 2017
DOI 10.2208/jscejipm.73.i_981
Authors

平澤 匡介, 齊田 光, 高田 哲哉, 石田 樹

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management)
#22
of 137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,343
of 452,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management)
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.