The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Liposomal Amphotericin B
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Medical Mycology, January 2005
|
DOI | 10.3314/jjmm.46.229 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Masatomo Fukasawa |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 18% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 27% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Medical Mycology
#23
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,419
of 152,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Medical Mycology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them