↓ Skip to main content

Contact Minerals from Kushiro, Hiroshima Prefecture

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Mineralogical Society of Japan, January 1971
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contact Minerals from Kushiro, Hiroshima Prefecture
Published in
Journal of the Mineralogical Society of Japan, January 1971
DOI 10.2465/gkk1952.10.170
Authors

Isao Kusachi, Tadayuki Numano, Kitinosuke Henmi

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Mineralogical Society of Japan
#2
of 43 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,088
of 15,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Mineralogical Society of Japan
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 41 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them