↓ Skip to main content

[内耳臨床]人工内耳術後の顔面神経刺激症例の検討

Overview of attention for article published in jibi to rinsho, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
[内耳臨床]人工内耳術後の顔面神経刺激症例の検討
Published in
jibi to rinsho, May 2013
DOI 10.11334/jibi1954.42.5supplement2_717
Authors

坪井 康浩, 東野 哲也, 牛迫 泰明, 森満 保

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from jibi to rinsho
#7
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,852
of 206,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from jibi to rinsho
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.