The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Misunderstandings in “Failure in Communicating an Environmental Issue Regarding Melting Ice in the Polar Regions and Change of Sea Level”
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the Japan Institute of Metals and Materials, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.2320/jinstmet.74.61 |
Authors |
Jusen Asuka, Seiichiro Yamamoto, Shinichiro Asayama |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 71% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 43% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 14% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Institute of Metals and Materials
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,155
of 175,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Institute of Metals and Materials
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them