The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On the Softening and Hardening Flow Properties of Some Suspended Systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Reoroji Gakkaishi (Journal of the Society of Rheology, Japan), January 1975
|
| DOI | 10.1678/rheology1973.3.4_145 |
| Authors |
Kaoru UMEYA, Takashi KANNO, Makoto WAGATSUMA, Hideaki IGARASHI |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nepal | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#17,874,772
of 26,173,059 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Reoroji Gakkaishi (Journal of the Society of Rheology, Japan)
#31
of 43 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,979
of 20,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Reoroji Gakkaishi (Journal of the Society of Rheology, Japan)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,173,059 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them