The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
戦後改革期における大学の組織運営と学長のリーダーシップ : 上原專祿と和田小六の「経験」を通してみえるもの(35.【一般B-5】高等教育政策と大学の自己変革-大学改革における学長の役割に関する比較史研究の試み-,一般研究発表II,発表要旨)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Japanese Educational Research Association, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.11555/taikaip.67.0_302 |
| Authors |
鳥居 朋子 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2021.
All research outputs
#15,379,802
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Japanese Educational Research Association
#26
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,740
of 341,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Japanese Educational Research Association
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.