↓ Skip to main content

音高の記号性と『徒然草』第220段の解釈

Overview of attention for article published in ONGAKUGAKU: Journal of the Musicological Society of Japan, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
音高の記号性と『徒然草』第220段の解釈
Published in
ONGAKUGAKU: Journal of the Musicological Society of Japan, April 2017
DOI 10.20591/ongakugaku.58.1_1
Authors

明土 真也

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#15,749,507
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from ONGAKUGAKU: Journal of the Musicological Society of Japan
#10
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,052
of 327,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ONGAKUGAKU: Journal of the Musicological Society of Japan
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one scored the same or higher as 23 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.