↓ Skip to main content

日本地史の研究

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi), December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本地史の研究
Published in
Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi), December 2010
DOI 10.5026/jgeography.38.7_427
Authors

早坂 一郎

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi)
#145
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,126
of 194,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi)
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.