↓ Skip to main content

気象病の多変量解析 (第2報)

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Biometeorology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
気象病の多変量解析 (第2報)
Published in
Japanese Journal of Biometeorology, October 2010
DOI 10.11227/seikisho1966.16.2_23
Authors

森 和, 矢野 忠, 藤井 幸雄

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Biometeorology
#21
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,090
of 110,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Biometeorology
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.