The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Navigating Ecological Transformation: Resist–Accept–Direct as a Path to a New Resource Management Paradigm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biab067 |
| Authors |
Gregor W Schuurman, David N Cole, Amanda E Cravens, Scott Covington, Shelley D Crausbay, Cat Hawkins Hoffman, David J Lawrence, Dawn R Magness, John M Morton, Elizabeth A Nelson, Robin O'Malley |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 176 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 37 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 66 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,154,010
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#431
of 2,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,566
of 518,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.