The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Poor relationships between NEON Airborne Observation Platform data and field‐based vegetation traits at a mesic grassland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ecy.3590 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie Pau, Jesse B. Nippert, Ryan Slapikas, Daniel Griffith, Seton Bachle, Brent R. Helliker, Rory C. O’Connor, William J. Riley, Christopher J. Still, Marissa Zaricor |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 31% |
| Panama | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 19 | 66% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 28% |
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,245,002
of 26,536,755 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#1,051
of 7,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,968
of 529,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#19
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,536,755 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.