↓ Skip to main content

がん治療を受ける患者に対する看護師のアピアランス支援の実態と課題および研修への要望

Overview of attention for article published in Palliative Care Research, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
がん治療を受ける患者に対する看護師のアピアランス支援の実態と課題および研修への要望
Published in
Palliative Care Research, June 2019
DOI 10.2512/jspm.14.127
Authors

Keiko Iino, Namiko Nagaoka, Keiko Nozawa, Shigeaki Watanuki, Taeko Shimazu, Shoko Toma, Yayoi Shimizu, Mieko Sagawa, Ayako Mori, Chikako Shimizu

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#15,847,489
of 26,390,482 outputs
Outputs from Palliative Care Research
#92
of 276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,214
of 370,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palliative Care Research
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,390,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 276 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.