↓ Skip to main content

選好の理由の言語化が選好に与える影響

Overview of attention for article published in The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
選好の理由の言語化が選好に与える影響
Published in
The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association, September 2018
DOI 10.4992/pacjpa.72.0_1am132
Authors

山田 歩

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2021.
All research outputs
#18,108,718
of 26,492,979 outputs
Outputs from The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association
#68
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,293
of 356,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,492,979 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.