↓ Skip to main content

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE MECHANISM OF CRACKS GENERATION ON NATM CONCRETE LINING

Overview of attention for article published in JSCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management = Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu F, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 125)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE MECHANISM OF CRACKS GENERATION ON NATM CONCRETE LINING
Published in
JSCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management = Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu F, January 2010
DOI 10.2208/jscejf.66.132
Authors

Hirofumi TAKAYAMA, Yasuo MASUDA, Takashi NAKAYAMA, Yoshiyuki UEMURA, Narentorn YINGYONGRATTANAKUL, Toshihiro ASAKURA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from JSCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management = Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu F
#12
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,985
of 175,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JSCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management = Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu F
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.