↓ Skip to main content

Studies on Foliage Urea Spraying (II)

Overview of attention for article published in THE JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE FORESTRY SOCIETY, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 104)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Studies on Foliage Urea Spraying (II)
Published in
THE JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE FORESTRY SOCIETY, December 2008
DOI 10.11519/jjfs1953.42.11_392
Authors

Takeo SHIBAMOTO, Haruji NAKAZAWA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from THE JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE FORESTRY SOCIETY
#8
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,037
of 183,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE FORESTRY SOCIETY
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.