↓ Skip to main content

防腐木材の効力試験法に関する研究(予報) : 木材防腐剤の防腐効力試験法について

Overview of attention for article published in 演習林 = Miscellaneous Information, the University of Tokyo Forests, February 1956
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
防腐木材の効力試験法に関する研究(予報) : 木材防腐剤の防腐効力試験法について
Published in
演習林 = Miscellaneous Information, the University of Tokyo Forests, February 1956
DOI 10.15083/00026421
Authors

芝本 武夫, 庄司 隆治

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,785,110
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from 演習林 = Miscellaneous Information, the University of Tokyo Forests
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#430
of 5,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 演習林 = Miscellaneous Information, the University of Tokyo Forests
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them