↓ Skip to main content

研修医採用試験へのSPI検査導入の意義

Overview of attention for article published in Igaku Kyoiku / Medical Education (Japan), February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
研修医採用試験へのSPI検査導入の意義
Published in
Igaku Kyoiku / Medical Education (Japan), February 2011
DOI 10.11307/mededjapan1970.35.377
Authors

田中 篤, 林田 憲明, 石川 陵一, 櫻井 健司

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#16,375,964
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Igaku Kyoiku / Medical Education (Japan)
#42
of 99 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,595
of 197,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Igaku Kyoiku / Medical Education (Japan)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them