You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experimental Tree Mortality Does Not Induce Marsh Transgression in a Chesapeake Bay Low-Lying Coastal Forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2021.782643 |
| Authors |
David C. Walters, Joel A. Carr, Alyssa Hockaday, Joshua A. Jones, Eliza McFarland, Katya E. Kovalenko, Matthew L. Kirwan, Donald R. Cahoon, Glenn R. Guntenspergen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#13,982,317
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#4,716
of 8,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,596
of 501,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#244
of 522 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 501,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 522 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.