↓ Skip to main content

A review of algal toxin exposures on reserved federal lands and among trust species in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of algal toxin exposures on reserved federal lands and among trust species in the United States
Published in
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology, December 2021
DOI 10.1080/10643389.2021.2010511
Authors

Zachary R. Laughrey, Victoria G. Christensen, Robert J. Dusek, Sarena Senegal, Julia S. Lankton, Tracy A. Ziegler, Lee C. Jones, Daniel K. Jones, Brianna M. Williams, Stephanie Gordon, Gerald A. Clyde, Erich B. Emery, Keith A. Loftin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 13 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#18,049,235
of 26,409,992 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology
#438
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#317,923
of 530,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,409,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.