The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
地震断層と海底地滑りを考慮した1998年パプアニューギニア地震津波の日本沿岸への適用
|
---|---|
Published in |
PROCEEDINGS OF COASTAL ENGINEERING, JSCE, March 2010
|
DOI | 10.2208/proce1989.47.341 |
Authors |
平石 哲也, 柴木 秀之, 原崎 恵太郎, 原 信彦, 三嶋 宣明 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,242,217
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from PROCEEDINGS OF COASTAL ENGINEERING, JSCE
#3
of 57 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,531
of 113,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PROCEEDINGS OF COASTAL ENGINEERING, JSCE
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.