The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impressive Mitral Valve Aneurysm Following Thickening of the Anterior Leaflet
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Journal, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-21-0919 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomoko Takahashi, Yasuhiro Yokoyama, Hiroki Arase, Kozue Ogasawara, Takashi Yamamoto, Akiyoshi Kakutani |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 30% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,037,196
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#382
of 2,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,451
of 514,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.