↓ Skip to main content

AFLP解析による種同定に基づく九州北部海域におけるメバル複合種群の計数形質

Overview of attention for article published in Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AFLP解析による種同定に基づく九州北部海域におけるメバル複合種群の計数形質
Published in
Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan, December 2021
DOI 10.34583/ichthy.15.0_33
Authors

安武 由矢, 髙橋 洋, 望岡 典隆

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2023.
All research outputs
#14,580,699
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#72
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,616
of 522,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.