↓ Skip to main content

Birds not in flight: using camera traps to observe ground use of birds at a wind-energy facility

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Research, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Birds not in flight: using camera traps to observe ground use of birds at a wind-energy facility
Published in
Wildlife Research, December 2021
DOI 10.1071/wr21071
Authors

Shellie R. Puffer, Laura A. Tennant, Jeffrey E. Lovich, Mickey Agha, Amanda L. Smith, David K. Delaney, Terence R. Arundel, Leo J. Fleckenstein, Jessica Briggs, Andrew D. Walde, Joshua R. Ennen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 9 69%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Unknown 9 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2022.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#1,056
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,798
of 512,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.