↓ Skip to main content

攻撃的行動を示す特定不能の広汎性発達障害の児童に対する機能的アセスメントを用いた介入(実践研究)

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
攻撃的行動を示す特定不能の広汎性発達障害の児童に対する機能的アセスメントを用いた介入(実践研究)
Published in
Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, April 2019
DOI 10.24468/jjbt.34.2_163
Authors

野口 美幸, 飯島 啓太, 野呂 文行

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,779,477
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies
#59
of 384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,473
of 367,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.