↓ Skip to main content

開花後の積算気温とソバ粒色との関係(日本作物学会中国支部講演会)

Overview of attention for article published in Report of the Chugoku Branch of the Crop Science Society of Japan, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
開花後の積算気温とソバ粒色との関係(日本作物学会中国支部講演会)
Published in
Report of the Chugoku Branch of the Crop Science Society of Japan, January 2018
DOI 10.24536/cssjchugoku.46.0_30
Authors

小葉田 亨, 今木 正, 中本 一也, 谷口 聡

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Report of the Chugoku Branch of the Crop Science Society of Japan
#2
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,940
of 452,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Report of the Chugoku Branch of the Crop Science Society of Japan
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.6. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.