The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clustering Supported Classification of ChemCam Data From Gale Crater, Mars
|
---|---|
Published in |
Earth and Space Science, November 2021
|
DOI | 10.1029/2021ea001903 |
Authors |
Kristin Rammelkamp, Olivier Gasnault, Olivier Forni, Candice C. Bedford, Erwin Dehouck, Agnès Cousin, Jeremie Lasue, Gaël David, Travis S. J. Gabriel, Sylvestre Maurice, Roger C. Wiens |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
Professor | 2 | 22% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 22% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Chemistry | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,670,563
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Earth and Space Science
#77
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,970
of 514,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth and Space Science
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.