The Japanese Society of Hematology recently published on acute exacerbation of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia (ITP) after mRNA-based severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. In addition, there is a growing concern for the development of the newly diagnosed ITP after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Herein, we report two cases of severe thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding tendencies at 4 and 14 days after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination. Platelet counts returned to normal following platelet transfusion or treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin and dexamethasone. To our knowledge at the time of the draft of this manuscript, nine cases of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced ITP have been reported. Although most patients showed favorable clinical courses similar to that of our cases, critical thrombocytopenia can lead to unfavorable outcomes. A national survey may be required to examine the causal relationship between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and the emergence of the newly diagnosed ITP and clinical outcomes of vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,110,354
of 26,744,542 outputs
Outputs from [Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology
#3
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,505
of 535,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from [Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,744,542 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 535,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
