↓ Skip to main content

Die Géometrie Descriptive von Monge im Urteil von Gauß

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Graphic Science of Japan, January 1978
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Die Géometrie Descriptive von Monge im Urteil von Gauß
Published in
Journal of Graphic Science of Japan, January 1978
DOI 10.5989/jsgs.12.27
Authors

Fritz Hohenberg, Shozo Masuda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Graphic Science of Japan
#2
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,811
of 25,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Graphic Science of Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one scored the same or higher as 39 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them