↓ Skip to main content

2.高濃度電解液の特異性に基づく二次電池革新の可能性

Overview of attention for article published in Electrochemistry, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 230)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2.高濃度電解液の特異性に基づく二次電池革新の可能性
Published in
Electrochemistry, December 2014
DOI 10.5796/electrochemistry.82.1085
Authors

Yuki YAMADA, Atsuo YAMADA

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 50%
Materials Science 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Electrochemistry
#29
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,731
of 369,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electrochemistry
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.