↓ Skip to main content

難波津の歌の享受史覚書

Overview of attention for article published in CALLIGRAPHIC STUDIES, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
難波津の歌の享受史覚書
Published in
CALLIGRAPHIC STUDIES, February 2012
DOI 10.11166/shogakushodoshi.2009.53
Authors

安國 宏紀

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from CALLIGRAPHIC STUDIES
#21
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,480
of 168,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CALLIGRAPHIC STUDIES
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one scored the same or higher as 14 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.