↓ Skip to main content

Cross-platform analysis of public responses to the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence on Twitter and Reddit

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cross-platform analysis of public responses to the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence on Twitter and Reddit
Published in
Scientific Reports, January 2022
DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-05359-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tao Ruan, Qingkai Kong, Sara K. McBride, Amatullah Sethjiwala, Qin Lv

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Lecturer 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 20 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 10%
Computer Science 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 22 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,320,806
of 25,058,660 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#20,601
of 137,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,790
of 515,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#541
of 3,490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,058,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 137,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.