↓ Skip to main content

JCS/JSCVS 2018 Guideline on Revascularization of Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
JCS/JSCVS 2018 Guideline on Revascularization of Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Published in
Circulation Journal, January 2022
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-20-1282
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masato Nakamura, Hitoshi Yaku, Junya Ako, Hirokuni Arai, Tohru Asai, Taishiro Chikamori, Hiroyuki Daida, Kiyoshi Doi, Toshihiro Fukui, Toshiaki Ito, Kazushige Kadota, Junjiro Kobayashi, Tatsuhiko Komiya, Ken Kozuma, Yoshihisa Nakagawa, Koichi Nakao, Hiroshi Niinami, Takayuki Ohno, Yukio Ozaki, Masataka Sata, Shuichiro Takanashi, Hirofumi Takemura, Takafumi Ueno, Satoshi Yasuda, Hitoshi Yokoyama, Tomoyuki Fujita, Tokuo Kasai, Shun Kohsaka, Takashi Kubo, Susumu Manabe, Naoya Matsumoto, Shigeru Miyagawa, Tomohiro Mizuno, Noboru Motomura, Satoshi Numata, Hiroyuki Nakajima, Hirotaka Oda, Hiromasa Otake, Fumiyuki Otsuka, Ken-ichiro Sasaki, Kazunori Shimada, Tomoki Shimokawa, Toshiro Shinke, Tomoaki Suzuki, Masao Takahashi, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Hiroshi Tsuneyoshi, Taiki Tojo, Dai Une, Satoru Wakasa, Koji Yamaguchi, Takashi Akasaka, Atsushi Hirayama, Kazuo Kimura, Takeshi Kimura, Yoshiro Matsui, Shunichi Miyazaki, Yoshitaka Okamura, Minoru Ono, Hiroki Shiomi, Kazuo Tanemoto, on behalf of the Japanese Circulation Society Joint Working Group

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Unspecified 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 31 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 36%
Unspecified 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 34 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,206,597
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#393
of 2,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,235
of 517,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.