The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
ハマボウの保全の歴史と現状(保全情報)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.18960/hozen.15.1_153 |
Authors |
中西 弘樹 |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 45% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 55% |
Environmental Science | 12 | 36% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#91
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,773
of 451,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.