↓ Skip to main content

感化教育・教護教育史における留岡幸助と家庭学校の意義

Overview of attention for article published in STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF EDUCATION, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
感化教育・教護教育史における留岡幸助と家庭学校の意義
Published in
STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF EDUCATION, June 2017
DOI 10.15062/kyouikushigaku.33.0_53
Authors

小林 仁美

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF EDUCATION
#10
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,421
of 331,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF EDUCATION
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.