The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cosmic Rays and Cloud Formation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi), January 2010
|
DOI | 10.5026/jgeography.119.519 |
Authors |
Ryuho KATAOKA |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 25% |
Researcher | 2 | 25% |
Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 38% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 25% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi)
#145
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,122
of 172,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi)
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.