↓ Skip to main content

太陽炉を利用したマグネシウムによる二酸化ケイ素の還元とその教材化

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Science Education in Japan, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
太陽炉を利用したマグネシウムによる二酸化ケイ素の還元とその教材化
Published in
Journal of Science Education in Japan, April 2016
DOI 10.14935/jssej.40.39
Authors

植田 和利, 伊東 和彦, 上原 誠一郎, 佐藤 博樹

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Science Education in Japan
#22
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,089
of 316,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science Education in Japan
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them