↓ Skip to main content

Think tank (1) - Its definition and the overseas situation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, January 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Think tank (1) - Its definition and the overseas situation
Published in
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, January 1990
DOI 10.1241/johokanri.33.769
Authors

Michio OBARA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,443,912
of 26,205,030 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#276
of 956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,846
of 58,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,205,030 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them