↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of normal down-flow column and new radial-flow column on rapid separation of proteins in egg white.

Overview of attention for article published in NIPPON KAGAKU KAISHI, January 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of normal down-flow column and new radial-flow column on rapid separation of proteins in egg white.
Published in
NIPPON KAGAKU KAISHI, January 1990
DOI 10.1246/nikkashi.1990.42
Authors

Yazaemon MORITA, Minoru KAWAKAMI, Takeshi INOUE, Satomi KANAI

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2022.
All research outputs
#23,320,957
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from NIPPON KAGAKU KAISHI
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,317
of 58,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIPPON KAGAKU KAISHI
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.