↓ Skip to main content

アジア・アフリカの諸言語の電算機処理

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
アジア・アフリカの諸言語の電算機処理
Published in
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, March 2016
DOI 10.1241/johokanri.22.519
Authors

坂本 恭章

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#343
of 954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,346
of 316,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#14
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.