The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantitative meta‐analysis reveals no association between mercury contamination and body condition in birds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Reviews, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1111/brv.12840 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alice Carravieri, Orsolya Vincze, Paco Bustamante, Joshua T. Ackerman, Evan M. Adams, Frédéric Angelier, Olivier Chastel, Yves Cherel, Olivier Gilg, Elena Golubova, Alexander Kitaysky, Katelyn Luff, Chad L. Seewagen, Hallvard Strøm, Alexis P. Will, Glenn Yannic, Mathieu Giraudeau, Jérôme Fort |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 34 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 59% |
| Scientists | 18 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 10 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,305,328
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#324
of 1,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,432
of 436,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#11
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.