The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Lunar Geophysical Network Landing Sites Science Rationale
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Planetary Science Journal, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.3847/psj/ac0f82 |
Authors |
Heidi Fuqua Haviland, Renee C. Weber, Clive R. Neal, Philippe Lognonné, Raphaël F. Garcia, Nicholas Schmerr, Seiichi Nagihara, Robert Grimm, Douglas G. Currie, Simone Dell’Agnello, Thomas R. Watters, Mark P. Panning, Catherine L. Johnson, Ryuhei Yamada, Martin Knapmeyer, Lillian R. Ostrach, Taichi Kawamura, Noah Petro, Paul M. Bremner |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 38% |
Georgia | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 92% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 30% |
Researcher | 4 | 20% |
Professor | 3 | 15% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 65% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,870,206
of 24,124,781 outputs
Outputs from The Planetary Science Journal
#249
of 708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,869
of 430,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Planetary Science Journal
#28
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,124,781 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.