The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Japanese Notation and Meanings among Three Terminologies in Radiological Technology Domain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.6009/jjrt.2016_jsrt_72.3.203 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ayako Yagahara, Shintaro Tsuji, Akihisa Hukuda, Naoki Nishimoto, Katsuhiko Ogasawara |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 33% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi
#25
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,692
of 402,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them