You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
石垣島名蔵湾に棲息するホシムシアケボノガイ(新称)(ブンブクヤドリガイ科),日本初記録
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Venus (Journal of the Malacological Society of Japan), May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.18941/venus.68.1-2_67 |
| Authors |
小菅 丈治 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2022.
All research outputs
#21,048,638
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Venus (Journal of the Malacological Society of Japan)
#32
of 34 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,791
of 355,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Venus (Journal of the Malacological Society of Japan)
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.