↓ Skip to main content

The Coalition for Conservation Genetics: Working across organizations to build capacity and achieve change in policy and practice

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Science and Practice, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Coalition for Conservation Genetics: Working across organizations to build capacity and achieve change in policy and practice
Published in
Conservation Science and Practice, March 2022
DOI 10.1111/csp2.12635
Authors

Francine Kershaw, Michael W. Bruford, W. Chris Funk, Catherine E. Grueber, Sean Hoban, Margaret E. Hunter, Linda Laikre, Anna J. MacDonald, Mariah H. Meek, Cinnamon Mittan, David O'Brien, Rob Ogden, Robyn E. Shaw, Cristiano Vernesi, Gernot Segelbacher

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 18%
Environmental Science 6 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,821,062
of 26,482,830 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Science and Practice
#303
of 1,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,786
of 454,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Science and Practice
#15
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,482,830 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.