The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
問われるストリート・エスノグラフィーの方法 : 都市の無意識を歩く作法―アレゴリーの力 : 遊歩と痕跡―都市の記憶を読む技法について
|
---|---|
Published in |
国立民族学博物館調査報告, March 2009
|
DOI | 10.15021/00001227 |
Authors |
近森 高明, Chikamori Takaaki, チカモリ タカアキ |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,450,176
of 26,737,129 outputs
Outputs from 国立民族学博物館調査報告
#3
of 50 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,995
of 112,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 国立民族学博物館調査報告
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,737,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 47 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.