The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A statistical framework to track temporal dependence of chlorophyll–nutrient relationships with implications for lake eutrophication management
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Hydrology, December 2021
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127134 |
Authors |
Qianlinglin Qiu, Zhongyao Liang, Yaoyang Xu, Shin-ichiro S. Matsuzaki, Kazuhiro Komatsu, Tyler Wagner |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 18% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 1 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,839,541
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hydrology
#630
of 8,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,203
of 514,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hydrology
#31
of 434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,701 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.