↓ Skip to main content

[論説] 正戦論の二大潮流の衝突 --<比例性>の原則をめぐる論争--

Overview of attention for article published in 社会システム研究 = Socialsystems : political, legal and economic studies, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
[論説] 正戦論の二大潮流の衝突 --<比例性>の原則をめぐる論争--
Published in
社会システム研究 = Socialsystems : political, legal and economic studies, March 2018
DOI 10.14989/230653
Authors

力 矢持

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,785,110
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from 社会システム研究 = Socialsystems : political, legal and economic studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,785
of 348,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 社会システム研究 = Socialsystems : political, legal and economic studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them