↓ Skip to main content

障害のある人の「障害」の語りの生起過程及び変化に関する検討

Overview of attention for article published in 臨床心理発達相談室紀要, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
障害のある人の「障害」の語りの生起過程及び変化に関する検討
Published in
臨床心理発達相談室紀要, March 2022
DOI 10.14943/rshsk.5.49
Authors

佑典 田中

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,986,364
of 26,097,697 outputs
Outputs from 臨床心理発達相談室紀要
#2
of 3 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,621
of 455,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 臨床心理発達相談室紀要
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,097,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them